Posts

Showing posts with the label SAAS security

Live Ensure® launches latest product features into US Market

  Live Ensure ® the SAAS  multi-factor authentication solution has spent the last year and a half field trialing the mobile version of the product with a few select customers who have collectively made millions of authentications without a single breach or failure.  Feedback provided valuable input which allowed the product to be further refined and streamlined making the user experience even better while making the solution stronger.   Live Ensure ® is easily integrated into an existing log-in form including SSO solutions like Twitter and Facebook.   This means that sites which allow users to log in e.g. with Twitter can now include a strong authentication layer thereby thwarting ID theft hacks which have become ubiquitous.   Examples are too numerous to mention but the weakness of password log-ins to emails ( Bush Hack )  and social media products (Twitter and Facebook) and their consequent failure are well documented. ...

Out with the Old and in with the New

I was asked today by a board member to respond to a question from a prospective investor who wanted to know how Live Ensure (our service) differed from two other – lets call them ….the more traditional solutions.  For the sake of this blog we will call them the Old and the New solutions.   Let me describe the Old Co solutions to you briefly.  They both embody technologies which are over a decade old ( think RSA ) such as tokens and servers ( both physical and virtual).  Their solutions rely on the user entering a PIN into a browser and thereby satisfying the ‘something you know ‘ part of strong authentication.   Here it is slightly edited. The biggest weakness of both Old Co solutions are the vulnerability to MITM and MITB attacks. Both require the user to enter a PIN ( something you know ) ie a second factor over and above the user name and password ( the single factor or weak authentication ). The user enters this PIN back into the browser which is...

DROPBOX HACK – WHY YOU SHOULD CARE ?

DropBox is flying as a company.  More and more of us are entrusting our data to their servers in the Cloud.    I am one of those.  The service is great, it works and it works from multiple devices.  However there is just one thing.  It is not secure.  Read about their latest breach here. ( http://www.zdnet.com/dropbox-gets-hacked-again-7000001928/ )  and also here ( http://gigaom.com/cloud/dropbox-yes-we-were-hacked/ ) I have been going on about passwords and their manifest weakness for months here and in other media.   DropBox have come back to their customers saying that they promise to do more – better passwords – better security …..blah blah blah. So what kind of solution should they use? Well first of all they have millions of customers.  So whatever they go for is going to have to be easy to deploy and should not require the distribution of some kind of hard token OTP generator a la all of...

WHY SECURITY MATTERS? (or LET’S START A ‘PASSWORD SPRING’ ! )

You would be forgiven for thinking that perhaps most people have become somewhat nonchalant about online security and that the prevalence of hacks has made most of us somewhat immune to the dangers.    Indeed I would say that some sites have become almost cavalier about their attitude to their member’s security.  The recent hacking of LinkedIn certainly did not elicit the kind of response I would have expected, indeed hoped for,  as a member.   I get the impression that it was something of an irritant that they hope won't come again – and are certainly not bothering with beefing up security.  Far too much hassle.   So is their reaction reflective of their members lack of interest – I think not,  as one of their members has tried to sue them for failing to provide adequate security.  ( http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/21/business/la-fi-tn-linkedin-5-million-hack-20120621 )   LinkedIn have said that they will salt their passwords...

You need authentication

I am constantly amazed at the lassez faire attitude that the majority of businesses, large and small, have about their online security.  Those that require their users / members to log on will provide a user name and password log in to verify their identity – and that’s it.  I suppose that if the large players like Amazon and iTunes can get away with it then the smaller guys think that’s all they need to. The reality is that if the big boys get a hit – they have the firepower to deal with it.  But SME’s just need one bad hack and they are out of business.    2011 is going down as the year of the ‘Hack’ (  http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/22481/year-of-the-hack-/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter)  with many high profile victims like SONY, RSA and Epsilon losing millions of their users personal information.    Despite this there seems to be the attitude that ‘ it cant happen to me’ .  ...

Authentication in ' context'

con·text /ˈkäntekst/ The circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed. authenticate [ɔːˈθɛntɪˌkeɪt] vb (tr)   to establish as genuine or valid What does context have to do with authentication? When you log on to a web site and enter your user name and password so as to ‘authenticate’ yourself all you are presenting are self reported credentials to the site.  If you present the correct credentials then the site accepts you as - who you say you are.   It takes you at face value.  It identifies you.  Liken it to a knight of old arriving at castle and announcing himself.   When you log on to a web site and it asks you to log in with a user name and password – you are in effect – announcing yourself – identifying yourself.   What happens if someone steals your password?   Then they can log on as you – the site is none the wiser – the thief has presente...

SIX MONTHS ON AND EPSILON STILL DONT SECURE THEIR USERS

In April this year,  Epsilon Data Management LLC  (one of the world's largest providers of marketing-email services) , a division of Alliance Data Systems Corp issued a statement, " On March 30th, an incident was detected where a subset of Epsilon clients' customer data were exposed by an unauthorized entry into Epsilon's email system. The information that was obtained was limited to email addresses and/or customer names only ." ( http://www.fastcompany.com/1744738/the-epsilon-breach-should-you-be-angry-worried-or-bored ) When it's all said and done, the Epsilon hack may be the largest name and email address breach in the history of the Internet.  Epsilon handles more than 40 billion emails annually and more than 2,200 global brands. If you are thinking you are safe because you opted-out of marketing emails, think again ( http://blogs.computerworld.com/18079/epsilon_breach_hack_of_the_century ) Epsilon required their customer...

ANONYMOUS / LULZSEC /ANTI-SEC ARE DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM !

I know,   I know – I hear the howls of protest even before finishing this first sentence.   “What about all the innocent lives exposed by the irresponsible publication of peoples names in positions of authority or in sensitive roles. ?”    But where does the fault lie ?  With those doing the breaking and entering?   Or those not providing adequate protection??  It is liked leaving your house locked without an alarm system, going on holiday, and coming back and finding it broken into.   Don’t be surprised.  You have no one to blame but yourself.  “ But these are criminals ! “  – I hear the sounds of self righteous chest thumping.    Maybe, but what they have done – I hope – is scare the s**t out of anyone who has anything (data) that is accessible via the Web  - and into ensuring that their ‘security’ ( if any ) - is rapidly upgraded.    This ranges from personal users who ...

A new video explaining how Live Ensure works

Image
Many of you have probably wondered about what Live Ensure is all about.  Well there is no more powerful medium than multi-media.  So watch this video ... let me know what you think