SECURITY SANS FRONTIERS


In many countries around the World, access to the Internet is seen as a basic right, and so it should be.    Those countries which have done so to date include :  Estonia, France,  Spain,  Greece  and Finland,  which was actually the first to do so in June 2010.  (http://www.publicserviceeurope.com/article/642/internet-access-should-be-a-human-right)  I

In fact the United Nations recently declared Internet access as a human right. (http://www.itproportal.com/2011/06/04/un-declares-internet-access-as-a-human-right/)

Obviously the next challenge is to build the infrastructure and provide the means of access.    But that is the subject of a separate discussion.

So the “World”  has woken up to the importance of closing the digital divide and has also realized the importance of the Internet, and access to it,  to the functioning of society.   Amongst the many momentous events of the last twelve months which have included epochal scenes such as the Arab Spring, the new Financial crisis ( Greece / Euro) and most recently the London riots - what has also made headlines globally has been the spate of cyber attacks and hacking which have damaged (and embarrassed) some very large corporations like Sony and RSA and large Governmental and NGO’s like the CIA and the NATO.    This has been coupled with the emergence of online activism dubbed ‘hacktivism’  (the online equivalent of protesting in Tahrir square) – lead by the likes of Anonymous and Lulzsec.   These high profile events and the associated media coverage has raised the issue of online safety, security (and privacy) and exposed just how vulnerable users of the Internet ( i.e. all of us ) are,   to becoming victims of cybercrime ranging from phishing,  pharming, ID theft and,  in the case of businesses, DDoS.

So it is all very well giving people access to the Internet.  Once they have access they need to be safe.   There is the risk that we create another ‘ digital divide’ .  This time the divide between those who can afford adequate online security and those who cannot.   We have called this the ‘security divide’.   There are those who are well informed about online security (most people reading this article would fall into that category) and those who haven’t a clue (the majority of people out there.)    But there are also those who do understand the issues but cannot afford the prices being charged by most security vendors.

In the spirit of trying to bridge the ‘ security divide’ we have embarked on a program of making LiveEnsureTM available,  to those organizations (who themselves have become soft targets for hackers ) like charities,  not-for-profits,  social enterprises and indeed small start-ups,  for free.

We have called this initiative ‘ security sans frontiers’.   If your organization requires its users to log-in or if it takes donations online  (in other words if you need to protect your users by ensuring your site does not get hacked) and you think your organization qualifies then please sign up at http://www.liveensure.com today.   Access to the Internet is and should be a basic human right but so too should safe access to the Internet be.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Passwords

Finally it seems … the penny has dropped.   Passwords are a poor substitute for real online security.   There is more and more ‘chatter’ about it.    Robin Henry writing in the Sunday Times on New Years Day talks of the end of ‘password hell’ invoking solutions in the pipeline from the Web Gods – Apple and Google.  The talk is of new biometric solutions such as facial and hand movement recognition.  Even IBM is talking this way.  ( http://www.forbes.com/sites/thestreet/2011/12/20/ibms-tech-predictions-for-the-next-5-years/ )  I agree with the notion that passwords are a dying breed but not that biometrics will become vogue.   They are fraught with problems of their own such as reliability, accuracy and the need for referencing of data-bases ( fail !) .    Why are passwords defunct?   Basically they are difficult to remember and they are easy to steal.    The solutions needed are those that require no cognitive load for the user ( the most unreliable participant in this enterprise
Read more

WIKILEAKS - the fuss?

Why all the fuss ? Why the ‘outrage’ at this ‘threat to national security’ ?   Are we really worried that nuclear war is going to break out because of these ‘dirty’ secrets getting out.  As if the North Koreans are going to up the ante any more than their mock charge of last week because of the abuse and scorn heaped upon them by US Diplomats.  ? !    Come on. To me the irony of this bluster is that it is (largely) from the right wing establishment in the US - calling it treason!     Any party that parades a half wit like Palin as a presidential hopeful hardly holds any moral high ground when it comes to protecting the USA.   Her appointment as the ‘leader of the free World’ will be enough to send any level headed American ( let alone any one of their Allies ) into a panicky tailspin at the thought of what she may stumble into ( by accident or design) . So how did these documents get out there?   Poor security.  Plain and simple.   If the US is so worried about this incident su
Read more

SPOOKS - CYBER ATTACK

Well I’ll be damned – if the subject of my last blog wasn’t the central theme to last nights episode of Spooks – CYBERWAR.    (To those who live outside the UK – Spooks is a very popular TV series about the goings on of a key team inside MI5 who spend their time thwarting terrorist attacks on the UK – while engaging in risqué amorous trysts on the side ).   And so last night we had the Russians and the Chinese –(working together !!) – ganging up on MI5 by infiltrating ( hacking ) their ‘secure’ internal network.     Whether the events portrayed were within the bounds of possibility or credibility who knows?     But if teenagers can break into the Pentagon – then I am sure that Russian/Chinese expert hackers can probably do something along the lines of infiltrating a UK Govt ‘Spooks’ departments network.      Either way it constituted an attack on British soil by foreign ‘combatants’ – which ( if it were true ) would have been a first since the Normans in 1066.   So we saw how vulner
Read more